Mela Authority Questions Swami's 'Shankaracharya' Title Amid Holy Dip Row

The Prayagraj Mela Authority has served a notice to Swami Avimukteshwaranand, challenging his use of the revered 'Shankaracharya' title and asking for clarification on its legitimacy. The notice references a Supreme Court order and an ongoing legal dispute over the rightful head of the Jyotir Math. This action follows a recent clash where the Swami's disciples allegedly broke barricades during the Mauni Amavasya bathing festival, leading to a protest. The authority has given him 24 hours to submit a response regarding the appropriation of the title.

Key Points: Shankaracharya Title Dispute: Mela Authority Serves Notice

  • Notice questions legitimacy of title
  • Cites ongoing Supreme Court case
  • Follows clash during Mauni Amavasya
  • Seeks response within 24 hours
3 min read

Amid row over 'magh snan', Mela authority questions Swami Avimukteshwaranand over 'Shankaracharya' title

Prayagraj Mela Authority questions Swami Avimukteshwaranand's use of the Shankaracharya title, citing a Supreme Court case and a recent clash at Magh Mela.

"The notice refers to a Supreme Court order and states that Swami Avimukteshwaranand is not recognised as the Shankaracharya of the Jyotirmath. - Mela Authority Officials"

Prayagraj, Jan 20

Swami Avimukteshwaranand has been served a notice by the Prayagraj Mela Authority, questioning the use of 'Shankaracharya' - a title meant for tallest gurus of Sanatana Dharma and seeking clarification over legitimacy of the designation.

According to Mela Authority officials, the notice refers to a Supreme Court order and states that Swami Avimukteshwaranand is not recognised as the Shankaracharya of the Jyotirmath.

It questions the basis for 'appropriating' the title 'Shankaracharya' and also asked him to submit a response within 24 hours.

The notice cites the case titled '3010/2020 Jagat Guru Shankaracharya Jyotishpeeth P.S.S.N. Saraswati versus Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati', which pertains to a long-standing legal dispute over the rightful Shankaracharya of Jyotir Math (Jyotish Peeth).

The case involves rival claims by P.S.S.N. Saraswati, also known as Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati, and Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati, with both sides contesting each other's eligibility and the validity of appointments.

The dispute has its roots in historical disagreements and has required scrutiny by trial courts, High Courts and the Supreme Court, particularly on matters related to injunctions and eligibility.

Both Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati (P.S.S.N. Saraswati) and Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati, a disciple of Swami Shantanand Saraswati, have laid claim to the spiritual headship of Jyotir Math, located at Badrinath.

In October 2022, the Supreme Court stayed the coronation of Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati as the new Shankaracharya of the Jyotir math in Uttarakhand.

Hindu scholars point out that traditionally, a peeth is not expected to remain without a Shankaracharya.

The title 'Shankaracharya' is commonly used for the heads of monasteries, or mutts, that follow the Advaita Vedanta tradition of Hinduism.

Adi Shankaracharya established four principal mutts across the country -- the Jyotish Peeth at Badrikashram (Badrinath) in the north, Sharada Peeth at Dwarka in the west, Govardhan Peetha at Puri in the east, and the Sringeri Sharada Peetham in the Chikkamagalur district of Karnataka in the south.

The issuance of the notice also comes against the backdrop of a recent clash between the disciples of Swami Avimukteshwaranand and the Magh Mela administration during the Mauni Amavasya bathing festival.

During the incident, the spiritual leader alleged that police personnel stopped him and his followers from taking a holy dip in the Ganga on the occasion of Mauni Amavasya.

Following this, Swami Avimukteshwaranand sat on a protest outside his camp, abstaining from food and water, and demanded an apology from senior officials of the mela administration and the police.

Mela Officer Rishiraj, however, claimed that supporters of the seer had allegedly broken barricades on a pontoon bridge that was reserved for emergency services.

District Magistrate Manish Verma said that similar questions regarding the status of the Jyotish Peeth Shankaracharya had been raised during the 2022 Magh Mela as well, after which legal opinion was sought by the then mela officer.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's sad to see such disputes among spiritual leaders. Adi Shankaracharya established these maths for unity and knowledge, not for legal battles. The focus should be on dharma and guiding people, not on titles and protests. Hope a peaceful resolution is found soon.
V
Vikram M
The timing of this notice, right after the clash at the Mela, seems convenient for the administration. Were they looking for a reason to question him? The police barricade issue and the title issue should be kept separate. One is about law and order, the other is a deep theological and legal matter.
R
Rohit P
As a devotee, this is confusing. Who are we to believe? If the Supreme Court has already stayed a coronation, then the matter is sub-judice. Maybe the Mela Authority should wait for the court's final verdict instead of issuing notices that can inflame sentiments.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from abroad. It's fascinating yet concerning how spiritual succession is handled. The blend of ancient tradition and modern legal systems is unique to India. I hope the outcome preserves the sanctity of the position for all Hindus.
K
Karthik V
With all due respect, this entire episode doesn't reflect well on anyone involved. The seer's protest, the police action, the broken barricades, and now a notice about titles. At the holy Sangam during Magh Mela, the energy should be of devotion, not conflict. Bahut dukhdai baat hai.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50