US Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, Jairam Ramesh Applauds Checks and Balances

The US Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that former President Donald Trump lacked the legal authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping tariffs on goods from US trading partners. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh praised the decision on social media, highlighting it as evidence that the American system of checks and balances is still functional. The ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, is expected to have significant consequences for global trade, businesses, and consumer inflation. The verdict represents a notable shift from the court's recent trend of siding with the Trump administration in interim orders on various policies.

Key Points: US Supreme Court Invalidates Trump Tariffs, Ramesh Praises Ruling

  • SC ruled Trump lacked authority for tariffs
  • 6-3 verdict called "decisive"
  • Ruling impacts global trade and inflation
  • Marks shift from court's recent pro-Trump stance
  • Based on 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act
2 min read

"American system of checks and balances still working": Jairam Ramesh praises US Supreme Court striking down Trump's tariffs

US Supreme Court rules 6-3 that Trump lacked authority for sweeping tariffs. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh praises the decision as proof checks and balances work.

"Hats off to the US Supreme Court for striking down President Trump's entire tariff strategy! - Jairam Ramesh"

New Delhi, February 20

Following the US Supreme Court's ruling that invalidated Donald Trump's sweeping tariff measures, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh on Friday praised the court for "striking down" the President's "entire tariff strategy".

Calling it an amazing decision despite its "ideological composition", he highlighted that the Bench of Nine Justices ruled 6-3, which is "decisive".

Taking it to X, Ramesh wrote, "Hats off to the US Supreme Court for striking down President Trump's entire tariff strategy! Quite an amazing decision given its ideological composition. A 6-3 verdict is decisive." He further added a sly remark that the American system of checks and balances "still seems to be working".

The majority ruling held that the US President lacked authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping import duties on goods from nearly all US trading partners.

In its verdict, the US Supreme Court held that the IEEPA does not grant the President the authority to levy tariffs.

The ruling is expected to have wide-ranging consequences for global trade, businesses, consumers, inflation trends and household finances across the country.

The verdict marks a notable shift from a series of recent wins for Trump at the Supreme Court. Over the past year, the justices had largely sided with the administration in interim orders, allowing policies such as a ban on transgender troops serving in the military, granting the United States DOGE Service access to sensitive data, and enabling significant cuts to the Education Department while legal challenges continued, The Washington Post reported.

The Bench of Nine Justices ruled 6-3, with Chief Justice John Roberts authoring the majority opinion. Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

"IEEPA's grant of authority to 'regulate . . . importation' falls short. IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties. The Government points to no statute in which Congress used the word "regulate" to authorise taxation. And until now, no President has read IEEPA to confer such power," Chief Justice Roberts wrote in his opinion.

"We claim no special competence in matters of economics or foreign affairs. We claim only, as we must, the limited role assigned to us by Article III of the Constitution. Fulfilling that role, we hold that IEEPA does not authorise the President to impose tariffs," he added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting analysis by Mr. Ramesh. The 6-3 split is indeed decisive and shows that even a conservative-leaning court can uphold constitutional limits. The checks and balances are the bedrock of a stable system.
V
Vikram M
This is a huge relief for global trade. Trump's tariffs were hurting everyone, including Indian exporters. Hope this brings some stability. 🙏 The Supreme Court's reasoning about the word "regulate" is very sharp.
P
Priyanka N
While I appreciate the court's decision, Jairam Ramesh's "sly remark" feels a bit unnecessary. We should focus on the legal principle, not score political points. Every country's system has its own challenges.
R
Rohit P
Finally some sense prevails! Tariffs just make things expensive for the common man. Inflation is high enough. Good on the SC for reading the law correctly. Hope our policymakers are watching.
K
Karthik V
The dissent by Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito is noteworthy. It shows the deep ideological divide. But the majority opinion by Roberts is very clear and grounded in the text of the law. That's how it should be.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50