MEA Dismisses "Trashy" Epstein Email Reference to PM Modi's Israel Visit

The Ministry of External Affairs has vehemently dismissed a reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a purported email from the recently released Epstein files, calling it the "trashy ruminations" of a convicted criminal. The Congress party has seized on the issue, stating that the PM's mention raises serious questions, while BJP MP Sambit Patra has accused the Congress of fraudulently editing an email to falsely suggest Modi took advice from Epstein. The U.S. Department of Justice released a massive batch of documents related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

Key Points: MEA Dismisses Epstein File Reference to PM Modi as "Trashy"

  • MEA dismisses Epstein email reference
  • Congress raises questions on PM Modi link
  • BJP accuses Congress of tweet fraud
  • Over 3 million pages of Epstein records released
3 min read

"Allusions in email deserve to be dismissed with contempt": MEA response to PM Modi reference in Epstein Mail

India's MEA strongly rejects an email in the Epstein files referencing PM Modi's 2017 Israel visit, calling it "trashy ruminations" of a criminal.

"the rest of the allusions in the email are little more than trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal - Randhir Jaiswal, MEA Spokesperson"

New Delhi, January 31

The Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal on Saturday strongly dismissed with contempt the references made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Israel in 2017 in an email that is purportedly part of the recently released Epstein Files.

In a video message, the MEA spokesperson dubbed the reference as the trashy ruminations of a convicted criminal.

"We have seen reports of an email message from the so-called Epstein files that has a reference to the Prime Minister and his visit to Israel. Beyond the fact of the Prime Minister's official visit to Israel in July 2017, the rest of the allusions in the email are little more than trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal, which deserve to be dismissed with the utmost contempt," MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said.

The MEA response was met with further questions by the Congress which has sought to raise the issue of the reference to PM Modi in the purported email.

"The PM is mentioned several times in the latest installment of the Epstein files released by the US Govt. The Official Spokesperson has been compelled to respond. But many questions do remain," said Congress RS MP Jairam Ramesh in a post on X.

Earlier, BJP MP Sambit Patra accused the Congress of spreading falsehoods by allegedly editing an email linked to the Jeffrey Epstein files to falsely suggest that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had taken advice from the disgraced financier.

Speaking to ANI here, Patra said the Congress had carried out what he described as a "fraudulent act" by manipulating the contents of an email attributed to Epstein.

"I want to expose the kind of tweet that has been made by Congress about Prime Minister Modi ji - a fraudulent tweet. As you all know, there's a person named Jeffrey Epstein, after whom the Epstein Files are named. Those Epstein Files were revealed. Jeffrey Epstein was a child trafficker, a sex offender, a person with no credibility, who was ultimately convicted and committed suicide by hanging himself," he said.

Patra alleged that Congress had deliberately added the words "his advice" to an email where such wording was not present, to create the impression that Prime Minister Modi had taken advice from Epstein.

Patra warned that the Congress's actions would not go unnoticed and that such actions would have consequences.

Earlier, the Congress party had sought to raise the issue of the Prime Minister being named in a purported email that is part of the documents released from the Epstein estate

"That India's PM could have a proximity to such a disgraced figure raises serious questions of judgment, transparency, and diplomatic propriety. It is now clear that the Prime Minister had a direct unexplained association with Jeffery Epstein whose infamous list of elite clients has wreaked havoc ever since the Epstein files began to be released," alleged Congress leader Pawan Khera.

The US Department of Justice on Friday (local time) released a major batch of investigative material linked to late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, making public more than three million pages of records along with over 2,000 videos and around 180,000 images.

Epstein died by apparent suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019, a month after being indicted on federal sex trafficking charges. He had earlier served 13 months in custody in Florida following a controversial plea deal in 2008.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I agree the source is despicable, the government's response feels a bit too dismissive. If the PM's name is appearing in such files, even in passing, citizens deserve a clearer explanation, not just contempt. Transparency is key. 🤔
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the whole Epstein saga is horrific. It's concerning that any world leader's name is even tangentially linked, regardless of the context. The focus should be on the victims, not political point-scoring.
R
Rohit P
Baseless allegations! The 2017 Israel visit was a historic diplomatic success. Linking it to this filth is the height of irresponsible journalism and opposition tactics. MEA did the right thing by shutting it down firmly. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
K
Kavya N
If the Congress allegedly edited the email, that is a serious matter. But if they didn't, then the government needs to address the curiosity head-on. This back-and-forth just creates more confusion for the common public.
M
Michael C
The language used by the MEA spokesperson is very strong – "trashy ruminations", "utmost contempt". It shows they are taking a zero-tolerance approach to any smear campaign. Interesting to see how this plays out internationally.
V
Vikram M

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50