Rights Advocate Alleges Election Manipulation in Pakistan-Occupied Gilgit-Baltistan

Human rights advocate Senge Sering has alleged systematic manipulation of the electoral process in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan. He claims elections are frequently delayed, leading to interim governments that influence the political environment for months. Sering asserts that opposition groups, including nationalist factions and supporters of Imran Khan, face administrative and legal hurdles designed to weaken them. He concludes that the process is fundamentally unfair and manipulated against critics of the Pakistani military's policies.

Key Points: Election Manipulation Alleged in PoGB by Rights Advocate

  • Elections lack fixed legal framework
  • Frequent delays cited for weather, geopolitics
  • Interim governments allegedly shape electoral landscape
  • Opposition parties face significant hurdles
  • Vote-splitting and legal measures used to influence outcomes
2 min read

Allegations of election manipulation surface in PoGB, claims rights advocate Senge Sering

Senge Sering claims elections in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan are delayed and manipulated by interim governments and intelligence agencies.

"This clearly shows that elections here are not fair, but manipulated. - Senge Sering"

Washington DC, April 14

Human rights advocate and President of the Institute for Gilgit-Baltistan Studies, Senge Sering, has alleged irregularities and manipulation in the electoral process in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan, claiming that elections in the region are not conducted under any fixed legal framework.

In a video statement, Sering said that elections in PoGB are frequently delayed on various grounds, including weather conditions and broader regional or international developments. He alleged that such postponements are often followed by the inception of interim governments comprising individuals approved by Pakistan's intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence.

According to him, these interim administrations remain in power for several months, during which the electoral environment is influenced. Sering claimed that a gap of five to six months was deliberately created between the formation of such governments and the eventual elections, allowing time for what he described as the manipulation of public opinion and political dynamics.

He further alleged that political groups opposing the policies of the intelligence establishment, including nationalist factions, Shia political parties, and supporters of Imran Khan, face significant hurdles despite having strong public support. Sering suggested that such parties have higher chances of electoral success, which, he claimed, leads to efforts to weaken their position.

Highlighting alleged tactics, he stated that multiple independent candidates are often fielded to divide votes, while administrative and legal measures are used to influence outcomes. He also referred to the possible use of provisions such as "Schedule 4" to place restrictions on certain candidates, though he did not provide specific cases.

Sering asserted that the prolonged interim period enables authorities to shape the electoral landscape in favour of preferred candidates. "This clearly shows that elections here are not fair, but manipulated," he said, adding that those critical of the Pakistani military's policies often encounter obstacles in contesting or winning elections.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's heartbreaking to read about the plight of our brothers and sisters in PoGB. They are an integral part of India's cultural fabric, and their voices are being stifled. When will the world act?
R
Rohit P
The allegations about using 'Schedule 4' and fielding multiple independents to split votes are classic tactics to undermine democracy. This is why a strong, unified international response is needed. The region's future cannot be decided by such games.
S
Sarah B
While the situation sounds troubling, I think we in India should also focus on ensuring our own electoral integrity is beyond reproach. We can't credibly point fingers if our own house isn't in perfect order. Just a thought for a balanced perspective.
V
Vikram M
The part about delaying elections due to "weather conditions" sounds like a flimsy excuse. It's clear the establishment there fears the actual will of the people. Jai Hind!
K
Kavya N
As an Indian, my heart goes out to them. We often take our democratic process for granted. Articles like this remind us of its value. Hope for a peaceful and just resolution for the people of Gilgit-Baltistan.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50