US-Iran Talks in Islamabad: High Stakes as Both Sides Seek Deal

Foreign affairs expert Waiel Awwad states that the composition of the US and Iranian delegations in Islamabad indicates both nations are serious about reaching an agreement. He identifies the strategic Strait of Hormuz as a central point of tension, linking the current crisis to broader geopolitical conflicts. Awwad suggests that global pressure and domestic political challenges for the US leadership are influencing Washington's urgent focus on reopening the strait. He also characterizes the US negotiating style as bullying and impatient, aimed at forcing an immediate resolution.

Key Points: US-Iran Peace Talks in Islamabad: Expert Analysis on Deal Prospects

  • High-level delegations signal seriousness
  • Strait of Hormuz is a key tension point
  • Geopolitical war linked to current crisis
  • US domestic pressure influencing approach
  • Iran using strategic pressure tactics
3 min read

"All eyes on Islamabad; both sides serious about reaching a sort of agreement", says foreign affairs expert Awwad

Foreign affairs expert Waiel Awwad analyzes the high-stakes US-Iran talks in Islamabad, discussing delegations, the Strait of Hormuz, and geopolitical pressures.

"both sides are serious about reaching a sort of an agreement - Waiel Awwad"

New Delhi, April 12

As high-stakes US-Iran peace talks unfold in Islamabad, foreign affairs expert Waiel Awwad on Saturday said the scale and composition of delegations signal that both sides are "serious about reaching a sort of an agreement", even as tensions remain over key issues like the Strait of Hormuz.

Speaking to ANI, Awwad said, "Well, I think today, all eyes are in Islamabad to find out what will be the outcome of this discussion. For two reason: either the Iranian delegation which is composite of around 71 persons including the the Chairman of the Majlis-e-Shura in Iran, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf. He is the one in charge of the discussion and he was given the full authorities of the government of Iran to continue the discussion; either he should be able to reach to an agreement or pull out of that agreement."

He added that the presence of senior American leadership reflects similar seriousness from Washington. "So I think the American also, led by their Vice President himself, including Witkoff and Kushner also, and a huge American delegation give you an indication that both sides are serious about reaching a sort of an agreement," he said.

Responding to concerns about the fragile situation and disagreements, particularly regarding the strategic Strait of Hormuz, Awwad linked the current tensions to broader geopolitical developments. "See, before the war on, there was no question of this Strait of Hormuz. Strait of Hormuz was open, there was no need for the discussion, there was no need for this war. And Iran have agreed for the nuclear issues to deal with the United States and the enriched uranium to be downgraded and that they have agreed on that on Geneva. But yet the United States went for a war only because of the Prime Minister of Israel dragged the United States President into this war," he said.

He further claimed that growing global pressure and domestic political challenges for US President Donald Trump have influenced Washington's approach." Now, with the global pressure on the United States and President Trump falling popularity in the ground and in US and the pressure increasing on him, definitely he realized that closing of Strait of Hormuz was not a good indication and that was in the hands of the Iranian, which is partially closed," Awwad stated.

He added, "And now he's focusing mainly on the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. Nothing else he was talking about: the uranium issues, the regime change, because militarily, they have failed to achieve their aim."

On reports suggesting Iran may have difficulty locating seas mines in the Strait, Awwad dismissed the claims as strategic messaging. "No, I think Iran already made it very clear that it is partially closed. Definitely they know where about. But I think that's also a pressure tactic on the United States that they should be able to reach to a sort of an agreement," he said.

He also criticized Washington's negotiating style, adding, "United States is in a very short temper, President Trump, he wanted immediate answer from the Iranian. Do it or die, that's his policy. He is bullying all every country he discussed with."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting to see talks in Islamabad. Pakistan often plays a complex role. Hope this brings genuine peace and doesn't become another geopolitical game where smaller nations suffer. India must watch closely and protect its interests.
A
Aman W
The expert makes a valid point about Trump's "bullying" style. It's not an effective long-term strategy. Diplomacy requires patience and respect, something often missing in current US foreign policy. Hope sense prevails.
S
Sarah B
While the analysis is detailed, I find it leans heavily towards one narrative. The complexity of US-Iran relations can't be reduced to just Israeli influence. There are legitimate security concerns on both sides that need addressing.
V
Vikram M
Any tension in the Gulf affects us directly. Our sailors, our oil imports, our diaspora in the region. A peaceful resolution is in everyone's interest. Jai Hind.
K
Karthik V
Good that talks are happening. War is no solution. But Iran also needs to be reasonable. The world cannot have a nuclear-armed Iran threatening shipping lanes. Balance is key.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50