AI unlikely to trigger 'Job Apocalypse', it may create uneven workforce disruption: Goldman Sachs Report
New Delhi, June 26
Despite rapid advances in artificial intelligence and growing concerns over mass job losses, a new Goldman Sachs report argues that fears of an imminent "AI job apocalypse" are overstated, although the technology is expected to significantly reshape labour markets over the coming decade.
The report, titled An AI Job Apocalypse, brings together views from economists and AI experts, who broadly agree that while AI will displace workers, it is also likely to create new employment opportunities over time.
Joseph Briggs, Senior Global Economist at Goldman Sachs, estimates that more than 9 per cent of the labour force, or around 15 million workers in the United States, could be displaced during a 10-year AI transition. However, he believes the disruption will be temporary.
"Despite our expectation that AI-related job losses will lead to a meaningful amount of labour displacement, we continue to expect that labour market headwinds will be temporary. Key to this view is our expectation that over the long run AI will create many new jobs even as it destroys existing ones," Briggs said.
Daron Acemoglu, Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Nobel laureate in Economics, expects AI to have only a modest net negative impact on employment over the next five years. He cautioned, however, that the longer-term outcome will depend on whether companies use AI to complement workers rather than replace them.
"AI is more likely to replace than augment jobs in the near term... So, I expect a net negative impact on the number of jobs in coming years. But the scale of job losses won't be anywhere close to the very large layoffs some are predicting," Acemoglu said.
He added that if AI investment continues to focus primarily on labour replacement, job losses could become more pronounced over the next decade.
Neil Thompson, Director of the FutureTech research project at MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, said AI's technical capability alone does not guarantee widespread job losses.
"The impact AI ultimately has on the labour market may not be nearly as large as its impressive capabilities suggest," Thompson said, noting that reliability, access to data, costs and practical deployment remain major constraints on adoption.Describing AI's likely impact, Thompson said the technology should be viewed as "a rising tide" rather than "a crashing wave", allowing businesses and workers time to adapt.
The report also finds that AI's effects are currently uneven across occupations. Goldman Sachs economist Elsie Peng said AI is both replacing workers in some occupations while increasing productivity in others.
"In practice, we find that AI augmentation has created jobs, but not enough to fully offset the job losses from AI substitution, resulting in a small net drag on the labour market," Peng said.
The report notes that younger and less-experienced workers could face greater near-term challenges, particularly in AI-exposed white-collar professions. However, Goldman Sachs economists Jessica Rindels and Pierfrancesco Mei say there is little evidence so far that AI has significantly harmed the employment prospects of recent college graduates, although they remain more exposed to future disruption than many other workers.
Overall, the report notes that while AI is expected to transform workplaces and accelerate productivity growth, historical experience suggests that labour markets are likely to adjust through the creation of new occupations, provided technological progress is accompanied by investment in human skills and complementary job creation.
— ANI
Reader Comments
"Uneven workforce disruption" — that's exactly what worries me. In India, we already have massive unemployment among educated youth. If AI displaces BPO and IT support jobs disproportionately in the developing world, while creating high-end roles in the West, that could widen the inequality gap. The report acknowledging younger workers face more challenges is a valid point. We need proactive policies, not just market optimism.
As someone working in tech, I think the 'rising tide' analogy by MIT's Thompson is spot on. AI is powerful but deploying it at scale requires massive infrastructure, reliable data pipelines, and regulatory compliance — things many Indian companies still struggle with. This transition will take years. Meanwhile, we should be learning tools like ChatGPT, Copilot etc to stay relevant rather than fearing them.
Interesting perspective from India. I work in global HR and we're already seeing companies do exactly what the report mentions — using AI to augment work rather than replace entire teams. But the '9% displacement over 10 years' estimate feels low; I'd bet it's more like 15-20% if automation accelerates. The key question is whether displaced workers can transition to new roles quickly enough.
My cousin works in a call center in Gurgaon and they've already reduced staff by 20% using AI chatbots. But management says they're hiring more people for process improvement and data analysis roles. So there is some truth to this report — some jobs go, new ones emerge. But the 'uneven disruption' is real: high-skilled workers benefit, low-skilled ones struggle. The government should prioritize inclusive AI policies.
V We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.