AI to power patent system overhaul: USPTO chief
Washington, March 26
The head of the US Patent and Trademark Office has said artificial intelligence will drive a sweeping overhaul of the patent system, as he defended reforms aimed at cutting delays and improving patent quality.
Testifying before a House Judiciary subcommittee on Wednesday (local time), USPTO Director John Squires said the agency is deploying AI tools to accelerate patent examination and reduce a growing backlog of applications.
"AI tools will become our examiners' superpowers," Squires told lawmakers, adding that new systems can identify prior art faster and help examiners handle increasingly complex filings.
He said the office had already begun integrating AI across patent and trademark processes, including tools that generate search results within seconds instead of months.
Squires framed the effort as part of a broader push to modernise the agency and strengthen the US innovation ecosystem. He described the USPTO as the "Central Bank of innovation," saying each patent or trademark represents "a potential job, a new business, a competitive advantage."
The agency is also targeting a reduction in its backlog of unexamined patent applications, which had risen to historic levels. Squires said efforts are underway to cut the backlog significantly while improving patent quality.
But the reforms drew sharp scrutiny from lawmakers, with Democrats warning that policy changes could weaken oversight and politicise a traditionally independent agency.
Ranking member Hank Johnson said the USPTO had been "drawn squarely" into partisan politics and raised concerns about employee morale and shifting rules.
"When policy shifts with the political whims of an administration, it is American innovation that pays the price," Johnson said.
A key point of contention was the agency's handling of patent challenges under the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Critics argued that limiting repeated challenges could allow weak patents to stand and increase litigation costs.
Squires defended the changes, saying they are designed to prevent abuse of the system and bring finality to disputes.
"There should be a point in time where there's quiet title... and it's got to be adjudicated once and for all," he said.
Lawmakers also raised concerns about foreign influence and national security risks, including the role of foreign-backed entities in patent disputes.
Squires said the USPTO has taken steps to tighten disclosure rules and block foreign sovereign actors from participating in certain proceedings.
The hearing also touched on a controversial trademark filing linked to a proposed "Board of Peace" initiative, with some lawmakers questioning potential conflicts of interest.
The USPTO received over 475,000 new patent applications in fiscal year 2025, reflecting steady growth in demand for intellectual property protection.
Squires said AI and IT modernisation would be central to managing this demand, alongside continued funding through user fees.
— IANS
Reader Comments
"Central Bank of innovation" is a powerful phrase. It shows how crucial IP is for an economy. Hope our policymakers are watching. But the political concerns are valid - patent rules shouldn't change with every election.
AI as examiners' "superpowers" sounds cool, but what about bias in the algorithms? If the AI is trained mostly on Western patents, will it properly recognise prior art from Indian traditional knowledge or local innovations? This needs careful thought.
The national security angle is crucial. With so much tech rivalry, especially with China, ensuring foreign entities can't game the patent system is a must. Tightening disclosure rules is a good first step.
Reducing backlog from months to seconds is a game-changer! This could really help Indian IT and pharma companies filing in the US. But hope quality doesn't suffer in the rush. A weak patent is worse than a delayed one.
While modernisation is good, the concerns about employee morale and shifting rules are important. A stable, predictable system is key for inventors to invest time and money. Constant policy changes create uncertainty. Let's hope they find the right balance.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.