85% of Bank Clients Eye Non-Bank Lenders for Better Service: Report

A new report reveals intense competition for corporate and investment banks, with 85% of clients planning to engage non-bank lenders within a year due to unmet expectations. Clients cite a lack of real-time responsiveness, personalization, and integration with their systems, forcing manual workarounds. Banks are hampered by legacy IT systems consuming their budgets and innovation programs that fail to deliver expected revenue or cost savings. To compete, banks are prioritizing real-time treasury, AI-driven products, and tokenization, but must overcome client distrust in AI and improve their technology foundations.

Key Points: 85% of Corporate Clients Plan to Use Non-Bank Lenders

  • 85% clients plan to use non-banks
  • Banks fail on real-time service & personalization
  • Legacy IT eats 43% of budget
  • AI governance is a major hurdle
3 min read

85% of bank clients plan to work with non-bank lenders: Report

Capgemini report reveals 85% of corporate clients plan to engage non-bank lenders due to unmet needs for real-time, personalized banking services.

"Non-banks are closing the competitive gap with established corporate and investment banks. - Catherine Chedru-Refeuil, Capgemini"

New Delhi, March 16

Corporate and investment banks are facing intense competition from non-bank financial institutions, as client expectations rise and technology initiatives fail to deliver the anticipated benefits, according to the Capgemini Research Institute's inaugural World Corporate and Investment Banking Report 2026.

The research showed that 85 per cent of corporate clients plan to engage with a non-bank financial institution within the next 12 months, in search of faster, more transparent, and responsive services.

CIB clients say they expect real-time responsiveness (58 per cent), personalized engagement (49 per cent), and innovative solutions (40 per cent) - but less than one-in-four (23 per cent find CIBs currently meet those needs.

Instead, many flag that CIBs offer limited integration with ERP and treasury systems forcing manual workarounds (92 per cent), display a lack of personalization and flexibility (89 per cent), and insufficient advanced analytics and forecasting capabilities (68 per cent).

Adding to their challenges, CIB executives report that current innovation programs are not delivering the expected results. A vast majority (82 per cent) say these efforts are not producing improved revenue via new products, while 51 per cent of respondents say they did not deliver the expected cost savings.

As client expectations rise, banks are finding they have limited capabilities to respond. Executives say that only 29 per cent of their IT budgets are currently directed to transformative technologies, while 43 per cent goes towards running and maintaining legacy systems.

In addition, 61 per cent of CIB executives say they are constrained by high compliance costs.

The findings come as Capgemini analysis shows CIB revenue growth is decelerating, with a forecasted 5.4 per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the next five years - down from 6.5 per cent between 2022 and 2024.

Despite structural headwinds, banks are continuing to broaden their product and service portfolios to remain competitive. CIB executives are prioritizing real-time treasury capabilities for cross-border payment flows (77 per cent) and next-generation AI market products for algorithmic trade execution, such as AI-driven hedging, and research insights (65 per cent). More than half are exploring tokenized products (51 per cent) to unlock new fee streams through digital custody, token issuance, and premium services.

"Non-banks are closing the competitive gap with established corporate and investment banks. Client demands have shifted dramatically, and while CIBs have invested heavily in AI, many are struggling to move beyond the pilot stage. A key reason is governance - only 26 per cent of banks operate with centralized AI oversight, making teams hesitant to automate crucial business processes," said Catherine Chedru-Refeuil, Global Head of Corporate and Investment Banking at Capgemini.

"To succeed, CIBs must adopt a disciplined approach: creating enterprise-grade platforms and cultivating an ecosystem of trusted partners. Early adopters will see tangible benefits in the form of deeper client engagement, improved fee income, and materially lower costs."

According to the report, CIBs will need to move on multiple fronts simultaneously to adapt to competitive pressures. Banks must take a critical look at their operating models to deliver a smoother client journey, rebuild their data and technology foundations to improve speed and embed AI governance into all major decisions. Equally important is client trust that CIBs have earned through decades of regulatory accountability - but remains a pressing challenge when it comes to AI-driven innovation. Many clients (89 per cent) question the reliability of AI-generated outputs in banking services, underscoring why transparency is key to earning their confidence.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
The stat about 43% of IT budget on legacy systems is the core issue. Public sector banks are especially stuck with old tech. How can they compete with agile startups? RBI's push for innovation can't come soon enough.
R
Rohit P
As a finance professional, I see this daily. Banks talk about AI and personalization, but their relationship managers are still pushing generic products. 89% lack of personalization figure is spot on. Trust is with banks, but service is with fintechs now.
S
Sarah B
Interesting global perspective, but in India the trust factor for banks is huge, especially after the PMC and Yes Bank crises. People might try fintech for small things, but for large corporate banking, I think established banks will hold on due to that trust.
V
Vikram M
The 92% manual workaround stat is painful but true. Integrating with our SAP system is a nightmare with most banks. We are actively looking at non-bank platforms for treasury management. Faster, cheaper, and actually works with our tech stack.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the article misses a key Indian point: regulation. NBFCs had a major crisis a few years back. Banks have stricter oversight, which slows them down but also makes them safer. Speed is good, but stability is paramount for the economy. A balanced view is needed.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50