NewKerala.com

30 Indian Fishermen Freed from Sri Lanka, Repatriation Eases Tensions

The Indian High Commission in Sri Lanka announced the repatriation of 30 Indian fishermen on Tuesday. This follows the return of 14 others in March, highlighting the recurring nature of this bilateral issue. Sri Lankan MP Harsha de Silva described the conflict as a complicated economic problem rooted in the livelihoods of small-scale fishermen on both sides. The dispute often involves accusations of illegal fishing methods and frequent apprehensions by the Sri Lankan Navy.

Key Points: 30 Indian Fishermen Repatriated from Sri Lanka | High Commission

  • 30 fishermen repatriated to India
  • Issue termed a perennial economic problem
  • Legal debate over bottom trawling methods
  • Recent history of detentions continues
2 min read

30 Indian fishermen repatriated from Sri Lanka to India, says Indian High Commission

30 Indian fishermen repatriated from Sri Lanka, easing a perennial bilateral issue. Read about the ongoing disputes and legal complexities.

"This is a perennial issue... folks are depending on fish for their living. - Harsha de Silva"

Colombo, April 7

30 Indian fishermen were repatriated from Sri Lanka on Tuesday and are on their way home, the Indian High Commission to Sri Lanka said on Tuesday.

Sharing the details in a post on X, the High Commission also posted the picture of the fishermen.

Earlier in March, 14 detained Indian fishermen from Sri Lanka were repatriated.

Previously, Sri Lankan MP Harsha de Silva told ANI that the issue of Indian fishermen in Sri Lanka is a perennial issue and will not go away soon, because both sides depend on fishing for a living.

"This is a perennial issue, you know it's not going away because I think on both sides of the straits, you know, folks are depending on fish for their living. These are not, you know, big corporates these are small fishermen, and when the Indian trawlers come, and you can see the satellite images, you know, they do not come in dozens but rather in hundreds, and they go back, so the issue, I think, is a complicated one. You can't just say this is the line so you stay here, and you know somehow stay on this," he said.

Silva then said that it is more of a legal issue than a political.

"Yes, every foreign minister and deputy foreign minister worked on this. It is about bottom trawling and whether bottom trawling is a traditional fishing method, and you know, does it destroy the seabed? But as I said, I think the solution is economics-related, not legal," he said.

On February 22, 12 fishermen along with one boat from Pamban were apprehended by the Sri Lankan Navy while fishing in the Gulf of Mannar between Dhanushkodi and Thalaimannar. The Sri Lankan Navy seized a boat belonging to a fisherman identified as David from Pamban.The incident triggered unrest among fishermen in Pamban, with more than a hundred boats from the Pamban South Wadi Fishing Port having ventured into the sea at the time of the apprehension.

The issue of frequent arrests of Indian fishermen by Sri Lankan authorities has remained a longstanding concern between the two countries, particularly affecting fishing communities in Tamil Nadu.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The Sri Lankan MP Harsha de Silva has a point. It's about livelihoods on both sides. We need sustainable fishing agreements, not just political statements. Bottom trawling is harmful, our fishermen should also adopt better practices.
S
Sarah B
As an outsider following India-Sri Lanka relations, this seems like a deeply complex issue rooted in economics and ecology. Glad for the repatriation, but a long-term solution respecting marine life and both fishing communities is crucial.
V
Vikram M
Heart goes out to these fishermen and their families. Living in Rameswaram, I've seen the anxiety firsthand. The Navy seizing boats is a huge loss. The government needs to secure the release of the boats too, that's their livelihood!
A
Aman W
While I'm happy they are safe, we must also ask why our fishermen repeatedly cross the maritime boundary. It puts strain on diplomatic ties. Both governments need to clearly demarcate zones and enforce them, for everyone's sake.
K
Kavitha C
This is a positive step by the High Commission. Diplomacy works. But the real test is preventing the next incident. Can we invest in alternative livelihoods or deep-sea fishing training for these communities to reduce dependence on contested waters?

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50